Legal Opinion
United States v. Mike Darwich
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 24, 2003No. 99-2147, 01-2044PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J., joined by Keith, J.,
KENNEDY, J. (pp. 668-669), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
OPINION
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Mike Darwich (“Darwich”) appeals from the eighty-eight month sentence imposed by the district court after he was convicted of conspiracy to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and after he was subject to criminal forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853. Darwich challenges the standard of proof used to establish drug quantity for sentencing, the sufficiency of the evidence used to prove drug quantity, and the receipt of firearm and…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- United States v. Karl CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Gilberto Martinez (03-3833), Jerel Henderson (03-3835), Kevin S. Harris (03-3879), Brian Garrett (03-3917)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. J. Richard JamiesonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. David CasillasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Marcus Franklin (03-2439) Jamaal Clarke (03-2440)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.