Legal Opinion · Dissent

Equity Mut. Ins. v. General Casualty Co. of America

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 20, 1943No. 2739Published

1DissentMurrah, Circuit Judge

For many years preceding the. event which precipitated this lawsuit, the LaBrunerie Agency had written all of the insurance for the Motter family, including the insured herein. When the insured' purchased a new automobile in the State of Kansas, he merely called the LaBrunerie Agency at St. Joseph, Missouri, .giving it the necessary data, with instructions to write a casualty insurance policy in accordance with the understanding which had existed between the Agency and the Motter family for about 14 years. Motter was interested only in coverage for his automobile, and the type and kind of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Grace v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Continental Insurance v. PearceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. Standard Life & Accident Insurance v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  4. Rose Inn Corp. v. National Union Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Wilson v. German-American InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API