Legal Opinion

Scholle v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 21, 1900PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Baltimore (Sharp, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

The appellant was indicted for unlawfully practicing medicine and surgery, in the State of Maryland, without being registered as a physician or surgeon in the Registry ■of Physicians and Surgeons.

The question presented by the appeal is the validity of the Acts of 1892, ch. 296, 1894, ch. 2x7 and 1896, ch. 194; all of which are incorporated in Mr. Poe’s Supplement to the Code as Article 43, secs. 39 to 63, sub-title Practitioners of Medicine. These statutes are the final results of a series of successive enactments, which have created a well-defined system for the regulation of the practice of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Schisler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Ashmore v. Greater Greenville Sewer Dist.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  3. Sanza v. Maryland State Board of CensorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  4. Commission on Medical Discipline v. StillmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Bradley v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API