Legal Opinion
State v. Bjorkaryd-Bradbury
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided March 27, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.
[¶ 1] Margaretha Bjorkaryd-Bradbury appeals from a judgment of conviction of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicants (OUI) in violation of 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2411 (1996) 1 entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Delahanty J.) following Bradbury’s conditional guilty plea after the denial of her motion to suppress evidence in the District Court (Portland, Horton J.). Bradbury contends that the District Court erred by denying her motion to suppress 5 evidence of her intoxication because the roadblock at which she was stopped violated 29-A M.R.S.A. § 2081(4)(E)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ashe v. Enterprise Rent-A-CarSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- McLaughlin v. Superintending School CommitteeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- State v. StevensSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- Alexandre v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- Garrison City Broadcasting, Inc. v. York Obstetrics & Gynecology, P.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.