Legal Opinion

Coe v. City of Albuquerque

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1970No. 8739PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SISK, Justice.

Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment granted to .the defendants, City of Albuquerque, Jack Coogan and Alida Coogan, and Roland Walters and Mary Walters. Plaintiffs sought to Have three ordinances of the City of Albuquerque declared void, insofar as they affect the property or property rights of plaintiffs. Summary judgment may properly be granted only if the moving party is entitled thereto as a matter of law upon clear and undisputed facts. Ute Park Summer Homes Ass’n v. Maxwell Land Grant Co., 77 N.M. 730, 427 P.2d 249 (1967); Great Western Construction Co. v. N.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ute Park Summer Homes Ass'n v. Maxwell Land Grant Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Spears v. Canon De Carnue Land GrantNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Martin v. Board of Education of City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Hewitt-Robins, Inc. v. Lea County Sand & Gravel, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Thomas v. JultakWyoming Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Slide-A-Ride of Las Cruces, Inc. v. Citizens BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  3. CITY OF AZTEC v. GuruleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Baptiste v. City of Las CrucesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Summers v. American Reliable Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API