State v. Sienkiewicz
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.
The defendant, Pawel Sienkiewicz, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the state's motion to dismiss his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. The defendant claims that the court erred in holding that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the merits of his petition and, therefore, erred in dismissing his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. 1
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our disposition of this appeal. The defendant is a native and citizen of Poland who legally entered the United States on a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. DasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. AquinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Richardson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. GrisgraberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. Dayvid J.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- State v. PalmentaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020