Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 16, 1914No. Appeal, No. 32PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 32, May T., 1913, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Dauphin Co., Commonwealth Docket, 1911, No. 265, for plaintiff in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Lehigh Valley Bail-road Company. Appeal from tax settlement. Tried by the court without a jury.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 32, May T., 1913, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Dauphin Co., Commonwealth Docket, 1911, No. 265, for plaintiff in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Lehigh Valley Bail-road Company. Appeal from tax settlement. Tried by the court without a jury. Kunkel, P. J., filed the following opinion: This is an appeal from the settlement of an account against the defendant company for tax on its loans for the year 1910. The case has been submitted to the court to be tried without a jury agreeably to the provisions of the Act of April 22,1874, P. L. 109. There being no dispute…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Oubiam,

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned president judge of the Common Pleas.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dornan v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company Tax CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Yarger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  5. Commonwealth v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API