Legal Opinion

Hootstein v. Town of Shutesbury

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 30, 2025No. 3:23-cv-30057Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MICHAEL HOOTSTEIN, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 3:23-30057-KAR ) TOWN OF SHUTESBURY, POLICE ) CHIEF KRISTIN BURGESS & MARY ) ANNE ANTONELLIS, in their ) individual and official capacities, ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT & DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE (Dkt. Nos. 94 & 109) I. Introduction Self-represented plaintiff Michael Hootstein (“Plaintiff”) asserts claims pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

of retaliation for the exercise of his First Amendment rights (Count I), violation of his rights…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API