Legal Opinion

Mull v. Roosevelt Irr. Dist.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1954No. 5856PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINDES, Justice.

Myrna Lee Mull, a minor, by her guardian ad litem, filed a complaint against Roosevelt Irrigation District, a corporation, seeking damages for personal injuries claimed to be the result of defendant’s negligence. On motion of defendant judgment was rendered dismissing the complaint for the reason that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a claim for relief. Plaintiff on bringing the matter to this court insists the facts alleged entitle her to remain in court for trial. Such is the sole question to be determined.

The complaint is extremely verbose but in substance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cook v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  2. Sanders v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Southwest Cotton Co. v. PopeArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Ford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  5. Elliman v. GombarOhio Court of Appeals · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shannon v. Butler Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Gillespie Land and Irrigation Company v. GonzalezArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Robles v. SeverynCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. Archie Epling v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  5. Parker's Hamburger Number One v. FitzgeraldArizona Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API