Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 2002No. 02-367Published

1Opinion of the Court

Lorain App. No. 01CA007848. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry dated February 14, 2002:

“Appellant has proposed that a conflict exists between the districts on the following issue: Whether Texler v. D.O. Summers Cleaners & Shirt Laundry Co. (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 677 [693 N.E.2d 271], abrogated the open and obvious doctrine as a complete bar to recovery and instead required that comparative negligence be applied to determine liability?”

2DissentMoyer, C.J.

The conflict case is…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Texler v. D.O. Summers Cleaners & Shirt Laundry Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Schindler v. Gale's Superior Supermarket, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API