Legal Opinion
Felicia Clay and Charles Bennett v. Stephen Love et al.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 14, 2026No. 3:23-cv-03074Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY FELICIA CLAY and CHARLES BENNETT, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 23-03074 (GC) (JTQ) v. OPINION STEPHEN LOVE et al., Defendants. CASTNER, District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Defendants Stephen Love, David Kelso, and the City of Asbury Park’s Motion for Summary Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (Rule) 56. (ECF No. 37.) Plaintiffs Felicia Clay and Charles Bennett opposed, and Defendants replied. (ECF Nos. 44, 45.) The Court has carefully reviewed the parties’ submissions and decides the matter…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.