Legal Opinion

State v. Crabtree

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1995No. Nos. A-94-366, A-94-367, A-94-368Published

1Opinion of the Court

Sievers, Chief Judge.

In these separate but consolidated appeals, Curtis Crabtree, Lori L. Harwick, and Deanna L. Hinkley each appeal from their convictions for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (Cum. Supp. 1992). The issue on appeal is the same in each case. The defendants argue that the results of their breath tests should have been suppressed because the tests were administered with the Intoxilyzer Model 401 IAS, which does not perform a “chemical test” as required by statute. For the reasons cited below, we affirm.

PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HicksNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. Roche, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. NicholsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Gandara v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API