Legal Opinion

City of Scottsville v. Hewitt

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 6, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming.

On June 8, 1922, the appellee who was the owner of a large farm conveyed three-fourths of an acre of it to the appellant. There was located upon the ground conveyed one large spring and one small spring. The appellant bought the ground, and these springs as a source of water supply for its municipal waterworks. The appellee was paid the sum of $1,000 cash for the land, and in the deed it was provided: “As a further consideration for said conveyance, party of the second part (appellant) shall install a valve and water trough at or near the large…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Proctor v. Union Coal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. CullinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cove Irrigation District v. Yellowstone Ditch Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Louisville Transit Co. v. Louisville & N. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API