Baumgarten v. Alliance Assur. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
1Opinion of the Court
VAN FLEET, District Judge.
The defendant moves to strike from the complaint certain paragraphs thereof as constituting redundant matter, and also demurs specially to the same matter as constituting no cause of action. The action is one to recover on certain policies of fire insurance, and, after making the averments usual in such an action, the complaint proceeds to set up the matter objected to, which, so far as material to be stated, is in substance that defendant refused to pay plaintiffs more than 50 per cent, on the dollar of their loss *277under tlie policies sued on, and threatened that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Loudon v. Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Patterson v. Marine N. BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Insurance Co. v. PiaggioSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Savings Bank v. AsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Reichert v. General Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Nissho-Iwai Co., Ltd. v. Occidental Crude Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Haigler v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. CasadyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Calvert Fire Insurance Company v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.