Legal Opinion
Franke v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 29, 1988No. C0-87-2015PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company appeals the judgment entered pursuant to an arbitration award. The trial court denied Farm Bureau’s motions to vacate the award.
FACTS
On June 15, 1985, respondent Bruce Franke was a passenger in an uninsured car driven by Brett Beneke. Beneke’s vehicle collided with another vehicle; the two adults in the other vehicle died. Franke received numerous injuries. Franke’s uninsured motorist protection was through appellant Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. (Farm Bureau).
The Farm Bureau insurance policy provides uninsured motorist coverage:
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- AFSCME Council 96 v. Arrowhead Regional Corrections BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- National Indemnity Co. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Lucas v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Eric A. Carlstrom Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 77Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Holman v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1989
- University of Minnesota v. WoolleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Vejdani v. Western Temporary Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992