Friday Invs., LLC v. Bally Total Fitness of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
INMAN, Judge.
*641 This appeal requires us to consider the common interest doctrine, which extends the attorney-client privilege to communications between and among multiple parties sharing a common legal interest. We hold that an indemnification provision in an asset purchase agreement, standing alone, is insufficient to create a common legal interest between a civil litigant indemnitee and a third-party indemnitor.
*642 Bally Total Fitness of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc. ("Mid-Atlantic") and Bally Total Fitness Holding Corporation ("Holding") (collectively "Defendants") appeal the trial court's Order…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- United States v. Robert McPartlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Goldston v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- United States v. Martin SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. William Aramony, United States of America v. Stephen J. Paulachak, United States of America v. Thomas J. MerloCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Friday Invs., LLC v. Bally Total Fitness of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
- Sessions v. SloaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Ap Atl., Inc. v. Crescent Univ. City Venture, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2017
- Baumel v. BarberDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
- Crosmun v. Trustees Of Fayetteville Technical Cmty. Coll.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.