Legal Opinion

Friday Invs., LLC v. Bally Total Fitness of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 2016No. 15-680PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INMAN, Judge.

*641 This appeal requires us to consider the common interest doctrine, which extends the attorney-client privilege to communications between and among multiple parties sharing a common legal interest. We hold that an indemnification provision in an asset purchase agreement, standing alone, is insufficient to create a common legal interest between a civil litigant indemnitee and a third-party indemnitor.

*642 Bally Total Fitness of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc. ("Mid-Atlantic") and Bally Total Fitness Holding Corporation ("Holding") (collectively "Defendants") appeal the trial court's Order…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. United States v. Robert McPartlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  3. Goldston v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. United States v. Martin SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. William Aramony, United States of America v. Stephen J. Paulachak, United States of America v. Thomas J. MerloCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Friday Invs., LLC v. Bally Total Fitness of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  2. Sessions v. SloaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Ap Atl., Inc. v. Crescent Univ. City Venture, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2017
  4. Baumel v. BarberDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
  5. Crosmun v. Trustees Of Fayetteville Technical Cmty. Coll.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API