Witt v. Jones

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

Plaintiff presents all assignments of error under two propositions in the brief, but in the view taken of the case here it will only be necessary to consider the first proposition, which reads;

“The tax deed is void, having been taken out without consent of the court while the property was in the hands of a receiver appointed by this court.”

This case is an outgrowth of cause No. 12941, Rice et al. v. Jones, 102 Okla. 30, 225 Pac. 958. In that case H. F. Jones commenced his action to recover judgment in the sum of $10,000 on a promissory note executed by O. J. Rice, Lola…