Legal Opinion

Bridgeford v. Groh Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1931No. Appeal 416PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This is an action of dower unde nihil habet, brought by the plaintiff, Mary Bridgeford, to establish her interest in certain real estate that her husband, John J. Bridgeford, acquired and conveyed, without her joinder, since the effective date of the Intestate Act of June 7, 1917, P. L. 429; the said John J. Bridgeford having died intestate on October 29, 1926, and having previously (1914), and while still married to plaintiff, gone through a wedding ceremony with one “Helen O. Bridgeford” by whom he had two children. The land in question was conveyed to Bridgeford on May…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shannon's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Mathiot's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Scaife v. McKeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Merrick v. DupontSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Commonwealth v. Glennon, Appeal of A. GlennonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Singer v. SheppardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. SummonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Miller v. Northampton CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Bridgeford v. Groh Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Hines EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Bucks County · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API