Legal Opinion

Safe Auto Insurance v. Koroma

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 2006No. 06AP-630PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bryant, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Dennis M. Koroma, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas concluding that plaintiff-appellee, Safe Auto Insurance Company (“Safe Auto”), has no contractual obligation to defend or indemnify defendant regarding an automobile collision that occurred while defendant was driving a rental vehicle. Because the trial court properly so concluded, we affirm.

{¶ 2} On March 7, 2005, Safe Auto filed a declaratory judgment action against defendant, seeking a ruling that Safe Auto owed no duty under the policy it issued to defendant to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bob-Boyd Lincoln Mercury v. HyattOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Cincinnati Insurance v. KramerOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Geico Gen. Ins. Co. v. State Farm, C-070733 (8-15-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Grange Mut. Ins. Co. v. PatinoOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Fratilla v. Owners InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API