Legal Opinion

Bob-Boyd Lincoln Mercury v. Hyatt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1987No. 86-1487PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented in this action is whether Hyatt was an insured under “Coverage Part 500” of the Universal policy at the time of the accident. We find in the negative and reverse the judgment of the court of appeals with regard to this issue.

The court of appeals found Hyatt to be covered under Coverage Part 500 of the Universal policy issued to Bob-Boyd. Coverage Part 500 is labelled “Garage Insurance” and provides coverage not only with respect to “Garage Operations” but also with respect to “Auto Hazard.” “Auto Hazard” is defined as:

“* * * [T]he ownership, maintenance or use of any AUTO…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of South Euclid v. JemisonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. George Leslie DUFFEY, Shari Lyn Duffey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Dean DOLLISON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  3. Brown v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Iszczukiewicz v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1960

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dairyland Insurance v. FinchOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State Farm Insurance v. McConnehea (In Re McConnehea)District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
  3. Cincinnati Insurance v. KramerOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Safe Auto Insurance v. KoromaOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API