Legal Opinion
Ward v. Lithibar-Matik, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 5, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*425In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Dillon, J.), dated January 21, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff Philip Ward was injured while operating a “depallator” machine that was delivered to Montford Brothers, Inc., by the manufacturer Builders Equipment Company (hereinafter BECO). His hand was crushed when he reached into the depallator to dislodge a concrete block that became stuck…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Schumacher v. Richards Shear Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Romano v. StanleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Ayala v. V & O Press Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- McMurray v. P.S. Elevator, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Estrada v. Berkel Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Wass v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Lippens v. Winkler Backereitechnik GmbHAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- LIPPENS, BRIAN v. WINKLER BACKEREITECHNIK GMBHAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Lippens v. Winkler Backereitechnik GmbHAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016