Legal Opinion

Deal v. North Carolina State University

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1994No. 9310IC534PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff concedes that the nurse was not NCSU’s actual agent or employee, but he argues that NCSU is liable for her negligence under the doctrine of apparent agency. Apparent agency, also known as agency by estoppel, is a form of equitable estoppel, see Fike v. Board of Trustees, Teachers’ and State Employees’ Retirement System, 53 N.C. App. 78, 279 S.E.2d 910, disc. review denied, 304 N.C. 194, 285 S.E.2d 98 (1981), and, that being the case, we are guided by the principles and policies governing equitable estop-pel in determining if the doctrine of apparent agency must…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hayman v. Ramada Inn, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Redevelopment Com'n of Greenville v. HannafordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Fike v. Board of Trustees, Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Long v. . TranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baptist Memorial Hospital System v. SampsonTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Synovus Bank v. ColemanDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2012
  3. Cefaratti v. AranowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  4. Leiber v. Arboretum Joint Venture, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Hatcher v. Flockhart Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API