Garner v. Martinez
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
There is no doubt that the trial judge’s participation in an ex-parte hearing at which opposing counsel made highly adverse statements concerning the absent and unrepresented appellant was so irremediably improper that he was mandatorily required to recuse himself. See Rollins v. Baker, 683 So.2d 1138 (Fla. 5th DCA1996); Wilson v. Armstrong, 686 So.2d 647 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Hanson v. Hanson, 678 So.2d 522 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Hatin v. Mitjans, 578 So.2d 289 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), review denied, 591 So.2d 181 (Fla.1991). Accordingly, we reverse the order under review denying the appellant’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hanson v. HansonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Rollins v. BakerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Wilson v. ArmstrongDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Hatin v. MitjansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brake v. MurphyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Holter v. DohnanskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005