Legal Opinion
Brake v. Murphy
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 7, 1997No. 96-3026PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
693 So.2d 663 (1997)
Eileen M. BRAKE, et al., Petitioners,
v.
Eve E. MURPHY, et al., Respondents.
No. 96-3026.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 7, 1997.
Rehearing Denied June 4, 1997.
Robert M. Brake, Coral Gables, for petitioners.
Richard T. Kozek, Jr.; Robert Ginsburg, County Attorney, and Lee Kraftchick, Assistant County Attorney, for respondents.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
NESBITT, Judge.
In this "interminable litigation"[1] between the beneficiaries of an estate, petitioners point to a number of claimed errors. We find one point determinative, that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Livingston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Fischer v. KnuckSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Strazzulla v. HendrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- Hayslip v. DouglasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Rose v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services v. Broward CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Robbins v. RobbinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Brake v. SwanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Carter v. HoweyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- HIP Health Plan of Florida, Inc. v. GriffinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.