Legal Opinion
State v. Clay
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 9, 1999No. AC 16279PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPALLONE, J.
The defendant, Robert Clay, appeals from the judgment of conviction of tampering with physical evidence in violation of General Statutes § 53a-155 (a) (l).1
*696The defendant claims that the evidence produced at trial was insufficient to convict him of tampering with physical evidence. Specifically, the defendant claims that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he concealed or destroyed the plastic bag and an amount of cocaine. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
At trial, Officer James Krolikowski of the New Britain police department testified that while patting…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. MirandaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- State v. ColemanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Ledarren S. HawkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. GibsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- People v. BrakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- State v. PaigeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. WidlakConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.