Dewey v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit 'Court, Lawrence County. Hon. James . McNenny, Judge. Action 'by Frances B. Dewey against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company.. From a judgment for defendant, and from an order denying a new trial,' p-laintiff appeals.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Circuit 'Court, Lawrence County. Hon. James . McNenny, Judge. Action 'by Frances B. Dewey against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company.. From a judgment for defendant, and from an order denying a new trial,' p-laintiff appeals. (i) Under .point one of the opinion, Respondent cited: Whaley v. Vidal, 128 N. -W. 331 (S. D.); Morris v. Stanley County, 128 N. W. 153 (S. D.); State v. Cullom, 23 S. D. 528; Iiepner v. Wheatley, 144 N. W. 923 (S. D.) Donahoe v. A'debar, 149 N. W. 175 (S. D.).
1Per curiam
The -printed record herein presents a question of practice upon which it would seem that the attorneys of this state should have long since been fully advised, if not through a reading of the statutes of this state and the rules of *281.'this court, then certainly through a reading of those decisions of this court wherein such question has been considered.
[1] In every code of rules promulgated by this court from the year 1891 down to the present day there is to be found one sentence which has always been considered of such importance that, in every copy of such rules printed under the direction…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Peterson v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Whaley v. VidalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. McCallumSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Morse v. Stanley CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Dring v. St. Lawrence Twp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.