Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
State v. Melisa Valadez
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 2016No. 2014AP000680Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAnnette Kingsland Ziegler, J.
¶ 57. (concurring in part, dissenting in part). I join the opinion of the court and its conclusion to reverse the order of the circuit court. I agree that under the specific facts of this case, and based on the arguments raised, Valadez has established that her pleas are likely to result in her exclusion from admission to this country.
¶ 58. I do not join the decision to "remand the cause to the circuit court to vacate the judgments of conviction and to permit Ms. Valadez to withdraw her guilty pleas and enter new pleas," majority op., ¶ 9, because there may be other impediments to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- William P. Jungels v. David Pierce, in His Official Capacity as Mayor of the City of Aurora, and City of AuroraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Swatek v. County of DaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. NegreteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. Hatem M. ShataWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Fernando Ortiz-MondragonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.