Legal Opinion

Zezulka v. Thapar

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided November 14, 1997No. 01-94-01195-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

O’CONNOR, Justice.

We overrule the motion for rehearing, withdraw our previous opinion, substitute this opinion, and again, reverse and remand.

This case requires that we determine whether the lack of a doctor-patient relationship is a defense to a suit against a doctor for failure to warn a third person that the patient is dangerous to that person. The trial court granted a motion for summary judgment based on the doctor’s lack of duty to the plaintiff because the doctor did not have a doctor-patient relationship with the third person.

Lyndall Zezulka (the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Lear Siegler, Inc. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Praesel v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Thapar v. ZezulkaTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Praesel v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Strasser, James v. Sulzer Medica USA, Inc., and Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API