Legal Opinion
In re Weinstock
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 7, 1932No. 284PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PEE CURIAM.
This is an appeal without leave from an order upon a petition of a trustee in bankruptcy against the bankrupt, summarily directing him to turn over a sum of money received by him, and alleged to be part of the bankrupt estate. As such it is a bankruptcy proceeding under section 24b, Bankr. Act (11 USCA § 47 (b), and not a controversy in bankruptcy under section 24a of the act (11 USCA § 47 (a). In re Shidlovsky, 224 F. 450 (C. C. A. 2); U. S. v. Moore, 294 F. 852, 855 (C. C. A. 2) (semble); Kirsner v. Taliaferro, 202 F. 51, (C. C. A. 4). There is no jurisdiction without leave to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kirsner v. TaliaferroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1912
- United States ex rel. Paleais v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- In Re TorgovnickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- In re ShidlovskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Byrd Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Williams v. SegoolCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
- McCabe v. GladstoneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- In re Postal Telegraph & Cable Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Moore v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936