In re Shidlovsky
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
1Opinion of the Court
WARD, Circuit Judge.
December 14, 1913, Sussman Shidlovsky, a manufacturer of dresses, carrying on business under the name of S. Shidlovsky &. Co., having collected accounts to the amount of $2,262.24, disappeared, and did not return to the city for about a month.
December 15th an involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed against him and a receiver appointed.
*451February 6, 1914, the receiver obtained an order requiring Shidlov-sky to show cause why he should not be compelled to turn over $1,-773.59 to him.
February 9, 1914, the matter was referred to a special master to take testimony and report.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kirsner v. TaliaferroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1912
- In re MertensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States ex rel. Paleais v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- In Re Byrd Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- In re WoodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Henkin v. FousekCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
- Henkin v. FousekCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.