Legal Opinion

Gregory T. Hardin and Kelly T. Hardin v. Ruth McClintic

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 2019No. Court of Appeals Case 53A01-1712-PL-2964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pyle, Judge.

Statement of the Case

[1] This appeal involves a dispute between adjacent property owners over a property boundary and the use of a gravel driveway located on the boundary of the two properties. Following a bench trial, the trial court determined that: (1) Appellee/Defendant Ruth McClintic ("McClintic") had established her counterclaims for adverse possession to land that was up to the right wheel track of the gravel driveway and her counterclaim for a prescriptive *646 easement to use the remainder of the driveway for ingress and egress to her property; 1 and (2) Gregory T. Hardin and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Wilfong v. Cessna Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Celebration Worship Center, Inc. v. Patrick Tucker and Carolyn P. Tucker, A/K/A Patty TuckerIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Garriott v. PetersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Piles v. GosmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dennis Millikan and Vicki Millikan v. City of Noblesville and KACE, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API