Legal Opinion
Kimberly Corporation v. Hartley Pen Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 10, 1956No. 14701_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
237 F.2d 294
KIMBERLY CORPORATION, a corporation, Appellant,
v.
HARTLEY PEN COMPANY, a corporation, Lindy Pen Co., Inc., a corporation, and Sidney Linden, individually and doing business as Adams-Linden Co., Appellees.
No. 14701.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
September 10, 1956.
Flam & Flam, John Flam, Eugene H. Marcus, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Harris, Kiech, Foster & Harris, Ford Harris, Jr., Donald C. Russell, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.
Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, BONE, Circuit Judge, and TOLIN, District Judge.
BONE, Circuit Judge.
1
This suit was originally instituted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Gillons v. Shell Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Morales v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Westfall Larson & Co. v. All-Man-Hubble Tug Boat Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Hartley Pen Co. v. Lindy Pen Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. Nutrition Now, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Capron v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Naxon Telesign Corp. v. Bunker Ramo Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981