Legal Opinion

McBurney v. Woodward

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 4, 1951No. 33684PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

“If a special demurrer is urged to a petition, or other pleading, already of file, attacking only certain parts of it, and *813is sustained, the result is to eliminate the parts so held bad.” White v. Little, 139 Ga. 522 (3) (77 S. E. 646). Where the special demurrer goes only to some particular part of the petition, without which a valid cause of action would still be set forth, the result of sustaining the special demurrer would be to strike the defective portion of the petition, not to dismiss the action. And where a special demurrer to a petition is sustained with leave to amend, and there is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. Ragsdale Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. McSwain v. EdgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. White v. LittleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Cheatham v. PalmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance v. PollockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McBurney v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API