Cheatham v. Palmer
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
1. The bill of exceptions is not subject to dismissal:(a) For the reason urged, that no proper plaintiff in error is named. Although the bill of exceptions is signed by counsel as "attorneys for plaintiffs [plural] in error," it refers to the "plaintiff in error" as "this defendant," and identifies such defendant as the one who filed general and special demurrers to the petition, and it is "this defendant" who excepts and assigns error on the adverse rulings. The fact that the other two defendants, who filed no demurrer, were not made plaintiffs in error is immaterial, for the reason that…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- City of Columbus v. AnglinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Lyndon v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Green v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Alexander v. ChipsteadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Georgia Veneer & Package Co. v. Florida National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Yeazel v. Burger King Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- City of Atlanta v. J. J. Black & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Darden v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. CUNEO Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.