Merrill v. Perkins
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Case. Reported 59 N. H. 348. Second trial on review. Verdict for the plaintiff, which the defendants moved to set aside because the damages were excessive. The court denied the motion, and the defendants excepted.
1Opinion of the CourtDob, C. J.
The defendants’ motion raised a question of fact to be determined at the trial term, and the case shows no error of law. Hovey v. Brown, 59 N. H. 114; Smith v. Cushman, 59 N. H. 519; Gamsby v. Columbia, 58 N. H. 60; Daniels v. Lebanon, 58 N. H. 284; Burnham v. Butler, 58 N. H. 568; Wentworth v. Jefferson, 60 N. H. 158; Dodge v. Stickney, 60 N. H, 461; Hovey v. Morrill, 61 N. H. 9, 14; Chase v. Woodward, 61 N. H. 79; Whitcher v. Dexter, 61 N. H. 91; Garvin v. Legery, 61 N. H. 153.
Exception overruled.
Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hovey v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
- Burnham v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
- Garvin v. LegerySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1881
- Daniels v. LebanonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1878
- Whitcher v. DexterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1881
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Golej v. VarjabedianSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
- Drown v. HamiltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
- Remick v. J. Spaulding & Sons Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
- Abbott v. Concord & Montreal RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1897
- Flaherty v. Manchester Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1916