Legal Opinion

Nicolai v. Desilets

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1936No. 25963. Department TwoPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This action was instituted by the receiver of The Sixth Avenue Sun Drug’ Co., Inc., a corporation, to have set over to him the lessees’ interest in a certain five-year lease, on property theretofore occupied by the corporation, made by I. O. and C. V. Desilets, as lessees, and Austin Lyons and Mable Lyons, his wife, as lessors, all of whom were made parties defendant. Lyons and wife answered and cross-complained, asking that the lease be declared void because of a misunderstanding, it being thought by the lessors that they were leasing* to the party who was then occupying the premises.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Mitchell v. . ReadNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Knapp v. ReedNebraska Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brophy v. Cities Service Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1949
  2. Bland v. MentorWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Ryan v. PlathWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. City of Lakewood v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. City of Lakewood v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API