Legal Opinion
State v. LaBelle
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 22, 1977No. 4652-1PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.
Defendant LaBelle appeals a jury finding of guilty, asserting that it was error to proceed with the trial of his case when he was not present.,
Darcy Dee LaBelle and Kenneth Fox were charged by information dated January 18, 1972, with burglary in the second degree. On January 19, 1972, both defendants appeared without counsel and advised the court that they were making arrangements to engage an attorney and did not wish to proceed with arraignment at that time. On January 28, 1972, they appeared again without counsel and the court appointed an attorney to represent both of them.
On February 11,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. CoyleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. SullensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- State v. ThomsonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. HudsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.