Legal Opinion
Abrazonine Co. v. Ohio Ceramic Engineering Co.
Cuyahoga Circuit Court
Decided May 31, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error.
1Opinion of the CourtHenry, J.
The parties here stand in the relation opposite to that in which they stood below. There the defendant in error recovered a verdict and judgment for $900.16 on a contract evidenced by the following correspondence:
“April 20, 1906.
“Mr. John Kline,
“Wyckliff, Ohio.
“Dear Sir: Confirming verbal proposition made by you this morning would say that we will furnish you one of our double die power silica presses complete, with one set of double dies for 6 emery wheels and one set of double dies for 3 emery wheels for $750 f. o. b. our factory. In case you return this press to us, you are to pay us $125,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bosworth v. St. Louis Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Fort Payne Coal & Iron Co. v. WebsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Scott and Company v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. BrownCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1902
3Cited by1 opinion
- Beneficial Ohio, Inc. v. Primero, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006