Legal Opinion

Laupahoehoe Sugar Co. v. Lalakea

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1924No. 1523PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PERRY, J. (Peters, C. J., dissenting.)

This was a suit for specific performance of an agreement in writing to renew a lease. Several persons were joined as respondents, evidently ‘ upon the theory that they were or claimed to be holders of the legal title in succession to the original lessor who had died after the execution of the original lease. A “decision, order and decree” having been filed by the- court requiring of Solomon Lalakea, one of the respondents, a renewal of the lease in question, an amended decree was subsequently entered, upon motion of the complainant,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kealoha v. Halawa Plantation, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Vivas v. AkoniHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Makaio v. AdamuHawaii Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jordan v. HamadaHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Lalakea v. Laupahoehoe Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Life of the Land v. Land Use CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Pioneer Mill Co. v. Victoria Ward, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  5. In Re the Estate of Cheong ChinnHawaii Supreme Court · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API