Legal Opinion

Hathaway v. Neal

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1926No. Civil No. 2480PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

— F. A. Hathaway, hereinafter called appellant, brought suit against I. L. Neal as surviving partner of the firm of Neal Brothers, and in his individual capacity, and Sarah Neal, individually, and as administratrix of the estate of W. A. Neal, Jr., deceased, hereinafter called appellees, to foreclose a mortgage on certain livestock in Mohave county. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and judgment rendered for the foreclosure of the mortgage .and for the application of the proceeds thereof in a certain manner. An appeal was taken to this court from that portion of the judgment…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Bowman v. CookArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API