Legal Opinion
United States v. Sidney A. Brodson
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 3, 1976No. 75--1452PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Associate Justice.
This appeal questions the validity of the dismissal of Appellee-Brodson’s indictment as the appropriate remedy for the Government’s violation in this case of one of the wiretap provisions of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 2517(5). Section 2517(5) restricts the use of intercepted wire or oral communications concerning criminal activities not specified by the order of authorization or approval for the original wiretap. Unless a judge of competent jurisdiction finds upon timely and appropriate application by the Government, that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Mack S. TaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- David R. Jones v. United States of America, Willie L. Short, Jr. v. United States of America, Arthur L. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Rocco Dote and Theodore P. Veesart, United States of America v. Nick Guglielmo and Joseph B. Delmonico, A/K/A Joey D.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- United States v. Roy L. Williams, Thomas F. O'malley, Andrew G. Massa, Joseph LombardoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. SouthardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- United States v. VentoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Isadore MarionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Van HornCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.