Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re New York City School Construction Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 5, 2001Published

1Concurrence

H. Miller, J.,

concurs in part and dissents in part and votes to dismiss the appeal from the order and to affirm the judgment, with the following memorandum, in which Friedmann, J., concurs. Although I agree with the majority that the appeal from the order must be dismissed pursuant to Matter of Aho (39 NY2d 241, 248), I respectfully disagree with the majority’s decision to reverse the judgment. In my view, Empress Realty (hereinafter Empress) is entitled to a brokerage commission under the circumstances of this case.

The relevant facts are as follows: The parties executed a brokerage agreement…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Wilson v. Ross Investment CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  3. Gaillard Realty Co. v. Rogers Wire Works, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Hammond, Kennedy & Co. v. Servinational, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Rennert Diana & Co. v. ZiskindAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API