Legal Opinion
Frank v. Frank
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 8, 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
10 N.J. Super. 73 (1950)
76 A.2d 527
ANNE FRANK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JOSEPH FRANK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 16, 1950.
Decided November 8, 1950.
Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.
Mr. Leo C. Zucker argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Samuel Roessler, attorney).
Mr. John J. Gaffey argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Minard, Cooper, Gaffey & Webb, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.
The complaint of the appellant wife against her husband, the respondent, embraces three causes of action.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Van Loon v. Van LoonSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Duss v. DussSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Frank v. Frank's Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Whitehead v. VillapianoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Rozycki v. PeleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Paramore v. ParamoreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Frank v. Frank's, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951