McConnell v. Davis, Director General
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Watts.
This is an appeal from a directed verdict by his Honor, Judge Peurifoy, for the respondent at a Court of Common Pleas for York County, December Term, 1922.
His Honor directed a verdict for the defendant on the ground of res judicata, and the exceptions, five in number, raise thejssues as to the application of this doctrine. The doctrine of the question of res judicata has been followed since the case of Hart v. Bates; these being: (1) Identity of parties, (2) identity of subject matter, and (3) identity of legal issue determined. 17 S.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jenkins v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- Johnston-Crews Co. v. FolkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Morrow v. Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
- Barfield v. BarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
- Greenwood Drug Co. v. Bromonia Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mitchell v. Federal Intermediate Credit BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- Jones v. City of Folly BeachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. PalmerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
- Priester v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929