S. F. S. Realty Co. v. George M. Adrian & Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtMadigan, J.
The corporate veil may be drawn aside to expose and enforce obligations which in fact are obligations of other persons. On the other hand, the corporate form is not to be employed as an instrument for realizing on unjust demands. Certain survivors of Henry W. Gennerich, who may be referred to, generally, as his family, would use plaintiff corporation as a cloak to conceal the realities here. It is fairly to be inferred from the evidence that Henry W. Gennerich for many years represented, in relation to the various real properties, both himself and his family, the word family being employed to…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Archawski v. HaniotiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Hughes v. W. O. Hughes Coal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957