Legal Opinion

Department of Transportation v. Randolph

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1998No. Docket 191228PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.

Defendants appeal as of right from an opinion and order awarding defendants attorney fees and costs in this condemnation proceeding. We affirm.

Plaintiff initiated a condemnation action to acquire property owned by defendants for the purpose of the *93relocation of US-27 in Clinton County. Plaintiff made an initial good-faith offer of $1,625,655 pursuant to § 5 of the Uniform Condemnation Procedures Act (UCPA), MCL 213.55; MSA 8.265(5), and paid this amount to defendants. Defendants contested the adequacy of plaintiffs offer, arguing that the property was worth approximately $9 million. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Smolen v. Dahlmann Apartments, LtdMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. In Re Condemnation of PropertyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Auto Club Insurance v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. RandolphMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. detroit/wayne County Stadium Authority v. 7631 Lewiston, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Department of Transportation v. RandolphMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API