Department of Transportation v. Randolph
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.
Defendants appeal as of right from an opinion and order awarding defendants attorney fees and costs in this condemnation proceeding. We affirm.
Plaintiff initiated a condemnation action to acquire property owned by defendants for the purpose of the *93relocation of US-27 in Clinton County. Plaintiff made an initial good-faith offer of $1,625,655 pursuant to § 5 of the Uniform Condemnation Procedures Act (UCPA), MCL 213.55; MSA 8.265(5), and paid this amount to defendants. Defendants contested the adequacy of plaintiffs offer, arguing that the property was worth approximately $9 million. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Smolen v. Dahlmann Apartments, LtdMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re Condemnation of PropertyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Auto Club Insurance v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. RandolphMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- detroit/wayne County Stadium Authority v. 7631 Lewiston, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Department of Transportation v. RandolphMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998