Legal Opinion

Dmytro Malakhov v. Bruce Scott, et al.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 24, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00646Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 DMYTRO MALAKHOV, CASE NO. 2:26-cv-00646-JHC 8 Petitioner, ORDER 9 v. 10 BRUCE SCOTT, et al.,1 11 Respondents. 12 13 I 14 INTRODUCTION 15 This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner Dmytro Malakhov’s Emergency Motion 16 for Temporary Restraining Order. Dkt. # 4. The Court has considered the materials filed in 17 support of and in opposition to the motion, including the underlying habeas petition at Dkt. # 1 18 and its supporting exhibits, and the applicable law. Being fully advised, for the reasons below,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Xochitl Hernandez v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Leiva-Perez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. State of California v. the Little Sisters of the PoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API