Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. Armitage
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtHall, C. J.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries instituted by appellee Armi-fage against the defendant railway company.
It appears that the appellee came to Amarillo seeking employment. That his occupa-tion was that of hoisting engineer, and after remaining in Amarillo a day or two, he decided to go either to Denver or Chicago. He purchased a ticket to Dalhart, Tex., intending to leave Amarillo on the night of March 21st, on a west-bound passenger train which left at 9:15 p. m. Entering the station some time before the departure of his train, he purchased his ticket, bought a Denver…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BighamTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- Eames v. T. & N. O. R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1885
- Blanch v. VillivaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Linn Motor Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Texas Utilities Co. v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Southern Underwriters v. GariepyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. StarlingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Armitage v. Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. StarlingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.