Legal Opinion
Gum, Inc. v. Gumakers of America, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 28, 1941No. Civil Action No. 1186PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARD, District Judge.
This case comes before the court at this time on defendant’s alternative motions to dismiss the complaint or to obtain a bill of particulars. The court is moved to dismiss the complaint (1) for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, (2) for lack of jurisdiction over the parties, and (3) for failure of the complaint to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. These defenses are asserted in accordance with Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The motion for a bill of particulars is pursuant to Rule 12(e).
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moog v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Kraft Corrugated Containers, Inc. v. Trumbull Asphalt Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
- National Millwork Corp. v. Preferred Mut. F. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Fischback v. Solvay Process Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1939
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gabriel v. O'HARASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- United States v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
- Mitchell v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1942
- Bowles v. OhseDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945
- Battin Amusement Co. v. Cocalis Amusement Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1941