Legal Opinion

Farrell v. M. C. Ragatz & Sons Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 13, 1933No. 29,521PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILTON, Justice.

Certiorari to review the order of the industrial commission award ing compensation for the death of petitioner’s husband, John R. Farrell, alleged to have been accidentally caused while in the employ of M. C. Ragatz & Sons Company, relator. The Public Indemnity Company was the insurer.

On October 21, 1932, Farrell, while in the employ of relator, went from Wadena, Minnesota, to Henning, Minnesota, to purchase potatoes for the relator. He interviewed one Traub, who was operating a gasolene filling station at Henning and who was also a dealer in potatoes. Traub had for sale a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Strommen v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Wicks v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gabriel v. Town of NewtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. Stanton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. Kemling v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  4. Simon v. Village of PlainviewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Eisen v. Jacquard Fabrics, Inc., New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API